It seems incredible doesn't it? The reality is that we're all gullible to some type of scam. When the cost to send billions of emails per day is virtually zero, one can take advantage of the extremely small number of people (in the extremely small number of people who will even get the email) who will seek the offer. And the numbers are very small, but look at how much spam gets thru all of the filtering you have in place. Should one of those pander to your penchant for discount dar chocolate truffles, you'll be hard pressed to stop that impulse to check it out.
I recently read a book by John Verdon called Think of a Number. In it the killer selects his victim using a smaller version of this same scam. By sending out a (relatively) large number of letters to potential victims in which he includes a sealed envelope with a number on it. In the accompanying letter, he tells his victim to think of a number, then open the envelope. Some percentage of the recipients will choose the number in the envelope. A smaller percentage of those will believe the sender has some sort of psychic connection and will follow his additional instructions. In the world of spam, the starting number is staggeringly huge.
My answer to the questions about spam that I receive frequently from my computer outsourcing customers is this, "We are the problem and spam won't stop until we all stop taking the bait."
Enjoy reading our blogs?
Are the people sending out the spam ever getting charged? Why can't we trace them more easily? If someone is going to be sending an email, shouldn't the company confirm where it's being sent from, so if it is spam, local authorities can catch the individual? Is there no jail time? Is the fine not high enough? Should ISPs have more oversight?
These are some questions that are still left unanswered by your article. It really doesn't take much to figure out what you wrote.
However, I will say, the psychotic killer was a very useful bit of knowledge.